Great Article on Zigtag / Update on Future Plans

Zigtag got a great writeup from one of our users, Paul Haley, on his blog.  Not only does the article describe the differences between Zigtag’s semantic tagging system vs. Twine‘s, but it also talks about online collaboration with groups, and data portability.

Given that Paul had some questions he raised in the article, I thought I’d respond to some of them here.

Paul mentioned that he was slightly cautious about using Zigtag or Twine because of the lack of a semantic export mechanism (it is important to note that we do export to del.icio.us and other formats, and a semantic export is not supported at this time because, well, there are no other applications that can read Zigtag’s semantic data and actually do anything with it).  The short term development plan includes releasing an API allowing users to access Zigtag’s semantic ontology and much of the data that we are gathering. This will include a similar API to delicious’, which will allow you to get information on your bookmarks, tags, groups, etc., and it will also allow access to our ontology (or our extensive database of defined tags).   Whether or not the API will use OWL as its format is to be decided, but if there is a market demand for OWL export, we will be happy to provide that.

One of our goals with the API is to allow other applications to be able to tag semantically.  There are literally thousands of applications out there that are using tags to organize their data, but nobody is using tags semantically.   For any number of applications with a large set of tags or information, categorizing semantically not only has the potential to organize that data much better, but it also allows the that data to interface with other applications using the same set of semantic tags, allowing increased interoperability and visibility.  One application we are contemplating is allowing blog writers to tag their wordpress blogs with semantic tags.  We are also open to gathering feedback from our user base – does anyone else have any cool ideas of things they’d like to see implemented?

On a related note, our users are always asking “Can I add my own defined tags?”.  In the coming weeks, we will also be providing a way for users to add, edit, and delete defined tags.  Initially, this will be limited to certain trusted users, but eventually the plan will be to expand it into a Wikipedia-like community process, where everyone can edit the definitions or add new ones.  We’re extremely excited about this as it will allow our semantic database and our users’ tagged data to be as accurate and inclusive as possible.

In short, we’re trying really hard to produce a powerful next-generation tool to enhance the semantic web.  Please feel free to comment on these ideas or other things you’d like to see.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: